NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Alpharetta · MP-26-05

Empire Old Milton Pkwy/Camden Pond

Follow the official record for case MP-26-05: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Aug 17, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Road or project area
Land Lots 2, 3, 44, 45 & 49, 1st District, 1st Section, Fulton County, GeorgiaSource · page 1 ↗ · Find on map ↗
Project site
3842 Old Milton ParkwaySource ↗ · Find on map ↗
Requested zoning
R-10M USESource · page 1 ↗
Project named in the record
Empire Old Milton Pkwy/Camden PondSource · page 2 ↗
Housing units listed
195Source · page 1 ↗
What the record describes
a master plan amendment, comprehensive land use plan amendment, and rezoning in order to construct 195 ‘For-Sale’ townhomes on 29.2 acres.Source · page 4 ↗
Site area (acres)
29.24Source · page 1 ↗
Housing units per acre
6.67Source · page 1 ↗
Existing zoning in this record
CUPSource · page 1 ↗
What is proposed
TOWNHOMESSource · page 1 ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Zoning definitions

A verified definition for R-10M USE, CUP is unavailable for this jurisdiction and case date.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. hearing scheduledCity of Alpharetta Community Development hearing

    Direct evidence link unavailable

  2. hearing scheduledscheduled

    Direct evidence link unavailable

  3. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules a hearing for a composite planning request →

    The official record places MP-26-05 before Alpharetta for a composite planning request.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta files a composite planning request →

    An official Alpharetta filing identifies MP-26-05 as a composite planning request.

  3. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta files a composite planning case →

    An official Alpharetta filing identifies MP-26-05 as a composite planning case.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules a hearing for a composite planning case →

    The official record places MP-26-05 before Alpharetta for a composite planning case.

  5. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta: MP-26-05 — new filing for a composite planning case →

    An official Alpharetta filing identifies MP-26-05 for a composite planning case.

  6. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta: MP-26-05 — hearing scheduled for a composite planning case →

    The official record places MP-26-05 before Alpharetta for a composite planning case.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Source follow-up: Scheduled.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incomplete6 packet/attachment evidence linksThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →