NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Alpharetta · E-26-02

120 Windward Parkway

Follow the official record for case E-26-02: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Project site
120 Windward ParkwaySource ↗ · Find on map ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. hearing scheduledCity of Alpharetta Community Development hearing

    Direct evidence link unavailable

  2. hearing scheduledscheduled

    Direct evidence link unavailable

  3. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta records Sign Exception case E-26-02 as a fact →

    The current lifecycle label is “fact,” dated Aug. 12, 2026.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    Community Development hearing scheduled in Alpharetta →

    A planning-recommendation record lists case E-26-02 for a Sept. 28, 2026, hearing.

  3. Published · Case reporting

    A planning recommendation is scheduled for a Sept. 28 hearing in Alpharetta. →

    The record identifies case E-26-02 and marks it scheduled for that date.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    Sept. 28 hearing listed for a planning recommendation →

    Case E-26-02 is listed as scheduled for a hearing on Sept. 28, 2026.

  5. Published · Case reporting

    Case E-26-02 is scheduled to be heard on September 28, 2026 →

    City of Alpharetta Community Development identifies the case as a planning recommendation.

  6. Published · Case reporting

    Case E-26-02 scheduled for a Sept. 28, 2026 hearing →

    The planning_recommendation record identifies the case as scheduled to be heard on that date.

  7. Published · Case reporting

    Case E-26-02 is scheduled to be heard on Sept. 28. →

    The City of Alpharetta Community Development record identifies E-26-02 as a planning-recommendation case with a scheduled hearing date of Sept. 28.

  8. Published · Case reporting

    Case E-26-02 is scheduled to be heard on Sept. 28. →

    City of Alpharetta Community Development records the matter as a planning recommendation.

  9. Published · Case reporting

    Hearing scheduled for Sept. 28 in case E-26-02 →

    The record identifies E-26-02 as a planning recommendation tied to a hearing.

  10. Published · Case reporting

    Hearing scheduled for Sept. 28, 2026. →

    Case E-26-02 is marked scheduled in a case-heard-at signal for that date.

  11. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta case E-26-02 is scheduled for a Sept. 28, 2026 hearing. →

    The record identifies this as a planning recommendation tied to a hearing.

  12. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules E-26-02 for Sept. 28, 2026 →

    The City of Alpharetta Community Development record marks planning recommendation case E-26-02 as scheduled, with a signal date of Sept. 28, 2026.

  13. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules a hearing for a zoning request →

    The official record places E-26-02 before Alpharetta for a zoning request.

  14. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules a hearing for a planning case →

    The official record places E-26-02 before Alpharetta for a planning case.

  15. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta schedules a hearing for a planning recommendation case →

    The official record places E-26-02 before Alpharetta for a planning recommendation case.

  16. Published · Case reporting

    Alpharetta: E-26-02 — new filing for a planning recommendation case →

    An official Alpharetta filing identifies E-26-02 for a planning recommendation case.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Source follow-up: Scheduled.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incomplete1 packet/attachment evidence linkThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →