Metro Atlanta News

CitiesExplore

Finance panel backs land-bank relief—but Atlanta would still cover canceled trash bills

Council consideration is next listed for Nov. 16. The proposal would exempt land-bank property from city charges billed through Fulton or DeKalb County.

Metro Atlanta Land Bank’s proposed break from city charges won a 5–0 recommendation from Atlanta’s Finance/Executive Committee on Nov. 10. But forgiving those bills would not make the city’s costs disappear: canceled solid-waste charges would have to be covered by the General Fund.⁠[1][2]

Ordinance 26-O-1618 is next listed for City Council consideration on Nov. 16 at 1 p.m. The favorable committee vote is a recommendation, not final passage; the Nov. 10 minutes are marked draft.⁠[1][2]

As our earlier report explained, the proposal offers targeted relief for land-bank property—not a general bill-forgiveness program for private owners. It would exempt property owned by the authority, or a qualifying successor, from taxes, assessments, fees and charges billed by Fulton or DeKalb County on Atlanta’s behalf. It would not waive every charge those counties levy.⁠[2]

The ordinance describes the land bank as a public body addressing dilapidated, abandoned and tax-delinquent property in Atlanta under the Georgia Land Bank Act.⁠[2]

Canceling charges would require advance approval from Atlanta’s chief financial officer or a designee, although authorization could not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Finance officials would also have to be notified afterward. The appropriate city or county revenue official could release the associated liens.⁠[2]

The reimbursement requirement would direct the CFO to replace the amount canceled in the city fund losing those charges, using an appropriate funding source. Solid-waste payments would specifically come from the General Fund, which the proposal also identifies as the source for exempt properties’ sanitary-service expenses. The reimbursement clause sets no dollar amount, leaving the size of the obligation unquantified.⁠[2]

Sources

2 official sources cited in this report. The bracketed numbers in the text link here.

Reporting history

Newest first. Articles reflect what was known at publication.

  1. Erasing land-bank charges wouldn’t erase the city’s tab

More from Atlanta

More in Atlanta →All stories →