Public records
Atlanta surveillance proposal would require public review and council approval for high-impact tools
The held ordinance would classify technology by capability and risk rather than price alone, while allowing limited temporary use for emergencies and major events.
Explore the source documents
A held Atlanta ordinance would require impact reports, written use policies, panel review, public participation and City Council approval before deploying high-impact surveillance technology. That category includes facial recognition, persistent tracking and automated public-safety profiling.
Sources01p. 1602p. 10002p. 101Under ordinance 26-O-1401, Atlanta Information Management would classify proposed acquisitions, deployments and material modifications by their capabilities, intended use, scale and foreseeable impacts—not price alone. Routine or low-risk technology could receive administrative approval without separate panel or council approval.
Sources01p. 1602p. 10002p. 98The proposal would permit temporary use without completing advance review when reasonably necessary for emergencies or major special events, but continued or recurring use would face the otherwise applicable review. The Public Safety & Legal Administration Committee held the council-substituted ordinance Sept. 28 for additional information and further review; these are proposed requirements, not enacted rules.
Sources01p. 1602p. 10102p. 102More from Atlanta
Reporting history
Newest first. Articles reflect what was known at publication.
Held Atlanta surveillance plan would restrict vendor data sales and require monthly police audits
Published after this articleExisting Atlanta surveillance systems would avoid retrospective approval under held oversight plan
Published after this article